艺术与技术之争?——设计学学科归属争议的本质缘由
作者:
作者单位:

湖南工业大学,株洲 412007

作者简介:

胡俊红(1968—),男,博士,湖南工业大学教授,主要从事设计理论与文化的教学与研究工作。

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Battle between Art and Technology? The Essential Reasons for the Dispute over the Attribution of Design Disciplines
Author:
Affiliation:

Hunan University of Technology, Zhuzhou 412007, China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    设计是艺术与技术的结晶。艺术与技术的相离相合推动设计及设计教育的发展与进步。透过西方现代设计的演变历程与发展规律,技术与艺术之争是推动设计思潮变迁的元动力。改革开放后,我国现代设计教育深受西方包豪斯现代设计教育体系的影响。同时,在学科与专业目录的不断调整之下,设计内涵与外延也在不断发生变化,艺术与技术孰重孰轻的矛盾也在不断推进我国设计教育的发展与进步。我国未来设计教育将朝着艺术化和技术化双轨制的路径发展。

    Abstract:

    Design is the result of art and technology. The separation and coincidence of art and technology drive the development and advancement of design and design education. Through the evolution process and development law of western modern design, the debate between technology and art is the meta-dynamic force driving the change of design thinking. After the reform and opening-up, China's modern design education was deeply influenced by the western Bauhaus modern design education system. At the same time, under the continuous adjustment of discipline and specialty catalog, the connotation and extension of design are also changing, and the contradiction between art and technology is also pushing forward the development and progress of design education in China. China's future design education will develop towards a dual-track path of artistry and technicalization.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

胡俊红.艺术与技术之争?——设计学学科归属争议的本质缘由[J].工业 工程 设计,2022,4(1):14-20. 复制

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-01-05
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-02-24
  • 出版日期:
学术质量评估服务项目启动通知
关闭