学科专业目录刍议
作者:
作者单位:

上海视觉艺术学院,上海 201620

作者简介:

通讯作者:

基金项目:


Humble Opinion on Discipline Catalogue System
Author:
Affiliation:

Shanghai Institute of Visual Arts,Shanghai 201620,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
    摘要:

    学科专业目录制度作为一项教育基本制度,在我国学科发展和人才培养方面发挥着不可替代的作用。但每次目录调整总会产生“专业设置滞后”“同质化培养”“教育资源被稀释”等负面影响。究其原因,一是目录调整周期过长,不能即时响应社会发展;二是执行主体的决定权有限,自主性和积极性受到抑制。为此,主管部门应该不断深化学科目录管理机制改革,加大“放、管、服”力度,将学科专业的设置、审核和“增撤”等决定权更多地赋予高校这个执行主体。

    Abstract:

    As a basic system of education, discipline catalogue system plays an irreplaceable role in discipline development and talent training in China. However, each catalog adjustment will always produce negative effects such as "lagging in specialty setting", "homogenization cultivation"" and "dilution of educational resources". The reasons are as follows: first, the catalogue adjustment cycle is too long to respond to social development immediately; Second, the decision-making power of the executive subject is limited, and the autonomy and enthusiasm are restrained. Therefore, the competent authorities should continue to deepen the reform of discipline catalogue management mechanism, strengthen the "release, management and service", and give more decisions-making power on the setting, review and "addition and removal" of disciplines and specialties to universities as the main body of implementation.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

叶苹.学科专业目录刍议[J].工业 工程 设计,2022,4(2):8-10. 复制

分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-04-20
  • 出版日期:
9月17日-18日 第四期设计学科精英研修班开班啦!
关闭